Connect with us

Facebook

New Florida Bill Fines Tech Companies for Banning Politicians

Brandon Marcus

Published

on

We may earn a small commission when you click or purchase an item using a link on this website.


Social media platforms can no longer ban politicians from using their services in the state of Florida, unless they want to be fined a hefty sum.

That’s the basis of the new bill signed Monday by Ron DeSantis. The Republican governor said that the bill is a way to protect free speech for elected officials and those in contention to hold office. It comes after months of accusations that tech companies, specifically Facebook and Twitter, are de-platforming politicians and limiting their access to supporters. 


In a statement, the governor said “If Big Tech censors enforce rules inconsistently, to discriminate in favor of the dominant Silicon Valley ideology, they will now be held accountable.”

Just how much will they be held accountable? Quite a lot, actually. The bill permits the Florida Election Commission to impose a fine of $250,000 per day to any social media company that bans a candidate for a statewide office. The fee for banning a candidate for a non-statewide position is $25,000 per day. A suspension of up to 14 days is still allowed under the new legislation.

“What we’ve been seeing across the U.S. is an effort to silence, intimidate and wipe out dissenting voices by the leftest media and big corporations,” DeSantis remarked. 

Many on the right applauded the bill while others decried it as an attempt to punish social media companies. These companies have come under heavy opposition from many following the 2020 election and especially after former President Trump was banned from multiple platforms after the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6. Since then, there has been a rise of allegations against tech companies and calls for federal legislation to limit their abilities to ban politicians and limit speech. 

While no national bills have been seriously proposed or debated in Congress, the Florida law is the first of what will likely be many more across the country. In fact, a similar law is now making its way through the Texas legislature. 


A child of the late 80s/early 90s, Brandon has been diving deep into all things tech his entire life. When he’s not reading and writing about the latest news and trends, he is drinking too much coffee, has his head deep in a book or is re-watching an old horror film he’s seen a million times already.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
1 Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] after an oversight board said that the same rules should apply to all its users, Facebook is set to end its controversial policy that has protected politicians from traditional moderation […]

Facebook

Former President Trump Sues Twitter, Facebook, and More

Brandon Marcus

Published

on

Former president Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he is suing Twitter, Facebook, Google, and their CEOs Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sundar Pichai, alleging that the social media juggernauts violated Trump’s First Amendment rights when they all banned him from their services. The 45th president has been barred from using Twitter, Facebook, and Google’s Youtube for months now after a mass of his supporters stormed the US Capitol on January 6th.

The suits against these tech giants are requesting that Trump be reinstated on all platforms. Currently, his only chance at returning to any of these sites lies with Facebook, which recently said Trump was banned until at least January 2023, although he may be allowed to return after that. 


The suits also demand that the court decide section 230 of the Communications Decency Act be ruled unconstitutional. Trump has long railed against section 230, which prohibits technology companies from being held liable by what users on their platforms post. 

“We’re not looking to settle,” Trump told reporters at a press conference in front of his gold club in Bedminster, New Jersey. “We don’t know what’s going to happen but we’re not looking to settle,”

Already there are many analysts saying the lawsuits will likely not be held up in a court of law. The claim that Trump’s First Amendment rights were violated will have a hard time passing muster with a judge because Facebook, Twitter, and Google are all private entities and not government institutions, therefore they are free to make choices related to speech that don’t violate constitutional rights. Still, it is one of Trump’s largest moves against Big Tech, a group he has been fighting since before leaving office. Following his ban from the platforms, Trump’s opinion on the companies only lowered and his drive against them increased. 

Immediately after announcing the lawsuits, Trump’s political action committees began sending out fundraising emails asking for money to help fund the lawsuits. 

Continue Reading

Facebook

Voters Think Social Media Companies are Profiting From Division

Brandon Marcus

Published

on

A new poll from Data for Progress says that a majority of voters think social media websites are playing a major role in the spread of lies, conspiracies and division across the United States. Additionally, the same poll finds that many voters feel that the CEOs of these social media sites are actively profiting and making money off of rampant mistruths.

The poll is just the latest news proving that people on both sides of the political aisle are not fans of social media and its grip on the public’s thinking. Although Democrats and Republicans across the country disagree on many things, they have one common consensus: social media is only driving this country apart more.


58% of voters in the new poll see social media playing a “very significant role” in the spread of lies and misinformation. The data states that Republicans feel this way at a slightly higher rate than Democrats, 65% to 50%. Independent voters feeling this way came in at 63%.

More troubling is the fact that most citizens think that little can be done to change the opinion of someone once they start to believe conspiracies and lies that are found online. A whopping 68% of all voters state that once someone is “hooked on a conspiracy” it is very difficult to change their minds. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents are all in sync on this topic with them believing it 68%, 69%, and 68% respectively.

The poll also found what could only be described as truly bad news for CEOs such as Mark Zuckerberg. Data for Progress says that 66% of voters believe that social media CEOs are profiting off of lies that find a home on their sites. Furthermore, 63% also feel that these social media companies actively allow the conspiracies to continue because it “kept users hooked on their products.”

The poll is quite damning for Facebook, Twitter, and other popular sites because it shows just how much people distrust them. However, it is unlikely that most of these voters will stop using the same sites they criticize. It feels that most people do not like the way these companies operate but still accept it and use their products daily.

Continue Reading

Amazon

Facebook, Google, And More Pressure SEC to Require Business Climate Reports

Brandon Marcus

Published

on

Seven of the biggest technology companies in the world are urging the federal government to hold them accountable about climate change. 

Amazon, eBay, Facebook, Google parent company Alphabet, and more sent a letter to Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler on Friday, asking that the SEC require businesses to regularly reveal issues related to climate change to shareholders and the public. 


The coalition’s letter stated that the companies “believe that climate disclosures are critical to ensure that companies follow through on stated climate commitments and to track collective progress towards addressing global warming and building a prosperous, resilient zero-carbon economy.” It marks one of the most high-profile attempts by big tech to spur more self-responsibility and involvement from their sector and follows other instances of the industry being vocal about the need to address climate change.

Perhaps the biggest request in the letter is regarding greenhouse gases. The companies claim that the SEC should require businesses to report on these gas emissions in an annual report that provides transparency to anyone involved in the company and any potential customers as well. 

Additionally, the group of businesses stated that they have purchased 21 gigawatts of clean energy in their quest for a fully renewable economy. 

The letter doesn’t come as a major surprise, since many major tech companies have long been adamant about fighting climate change. However, even the most vocal companies have been criticized for their lack of tangible action. Recently, some of these companies – such as Amazon – have put forth plans to show how serious they are about tackling the pressing issue. Jeff Bezos launched the “Climate Pledge” in September 2019, which included plans for Amazon to use 80% renewable energy by 2024 before transitioning to complete zero emissions by the year 2030. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Sign Up For The Latest Bite Sized Tech News


Trending

    1
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x